Score on Coma Recovery Scale-Revised at admission predicts outcome at discharge in intensive rehabilitation after severe brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic utility of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) in rehabilitation of patients surviving from severe brain injury. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, all patients consecutively admitted to an Italian Intensive Rehabilitation Unit, with a diagnosis of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) due to acquired brain injury, underwent clinical evaluations using the Italian version of the CRS-R. At discharge, patients transitioning from UWS to MCS or emergence from MCS (E-MCS) and from MCS to E-MCS were classified as improved responsiveness (IR). Score on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at discharge was recorded. RESULTS: In total, 137 (66 UWS, 71 MCS) subjects were enrolled. After a mean hospital stay of 5.3 ± 2.9 months, 81 (59.1%) patients achieved an IR. In the multivariable analysis, IR was associated with higher CRS-R score at admission (p = 0.002) and younger age at injury (p = 0.010). Moreover, higher GOS scores at discharge were related to younger age at injury (p = 0.018), shorter time post-onset (p = 0.003) and higher CRS-R score at admission (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher CRS-R scores at admission in intensive rehabilitation unit can help differentiate patients with better outcome at discharge, providing information for rehabilitation planning and communication with patients and their caregivers.

Improvement on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised During the First Four Weeks of Hospital Stay Predicts Outcome at Discharge in Intensive Rehabilitation After Severe Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic utility of serial assessment on the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) during the first 4 weeks of intensive rehabilitation in patients surviving a severe brain injury. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: An intensive rehabilitation unit. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=110) consecutively admitted to the intensive rehabilitation unit. Inclusion criteria were (1) a diagnosis of unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) caused by an acquired brain injury, and (2) aged >18 years. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent clinical evaluations using the Italian version of the CRS-R during the first month of hospital stay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Behavioral classification on the CRS-R and the score on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at final discharge. Patients transitioning from UWS to MCS or emergence from MCS (E-MCS), and from MCS to E-MCS were classified as patients with improved responsiveness (IR). RESULTS: After a mean ± SD hospital stay of 5.3±2.7 months, 59 of 110 patients (53.6%) achieved IR. In the multivariable analysis, a higher CRS-R score change at week 4 (odds ratio =1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-2.66; P<.001) was the only significant predictor of IR at discharge. Fifty-three patients (48.2%) were classified as severely impaired at discharge (GOS=3). In the multivariable analysis, higher GOS scores were related to a higher CRS-R score at admission (B=.051; 95% CI, .027-.074; P<.001), a higher CRS-R score change at week 4 (B=.087; 95% CI, .064-.110; P<.001), and an absence of severe infections (B=-.477; 95% CI, -.778 to -.176; P=.002). CONCLUSIONS: An improvement on the total CRS-R score and on different subscales across the first 4 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation discriminates patients who will have a better outcome at discharge, providing information for rehabilitation planning and for communication with patients and their caregivers.